Week 03
February 17, 2025
“While the GDP and the rest of the national accounts may seem to be arcane concepts, they are truly among the great inventions of modern times.” Paul Samuelson and William Nordhaus, Nobel Prize winners
GDP stands for “Gross Domestic Product”
Definition. GDP
In the production approach, we define GDP as the current market value of all final goods and services (G&S) newly produced in the economy during a given period of time.
\[Y = C + I + G + NX \tag{1}\]
The income approach involves adding up all the incomes received in the economy by households, firms, and the government:
GDP \(=\) Compensation of employees \(+\) Taxes on production and imports less subsidies \(+\) Operating surplus \(+\) Depreciation
NFI stands for “Net Factor Income”, GNP for “Gross National Product”, and GDP for “Gross Domestic Product”
Suppose an economy produces only apples & oranges: periods 1,2: \(~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\)
As year-1 is the base year, \(realGDP_1\) has to be equal to nominal \(GDP_1\) \[ realGDP_1=G D P_1=130 \text { dollars } \]
\(realGDP_2\) is calculated as if prices remain constant (those of year 1) \[ realGDP_2=80 \times 1+120 \times 0.8=176 \text { dollars } \]
Using year 1 as the base year, real GDP grows between periods 1 and 2: \[ g_{b_1}=\left(\frac{realGDP_2}{realGDP_1}-1\right)=35.38 \% \]
\(g_{b_1}\) represents the rate of growth between the two years, using year 1 as the base year.
As year-2 is the base year, \(realGDP_2\) has to be equal to nominal \(GDP_2\) \[ realGDP_2= GDP_2=292 \text { dollars } \]
\(realGDP_1\) is calculated as if prices remain constant (those of year 2) \[ realGDP_1=50 \times 1.25+100 \times 1.6=222.5 \text { dollars } \]
Using year-2 as the base year, real GDP grows between periods 1 and 2: \[ g_{b_2}=\left(\frac{realGDP_2}{realGDP_1}-1\right)=31.23 \% \]
\(g_{b_2}\) represents the rate of growth between the two years, using year 2 as the base year.
Using year-1 as the base year: \[g_{b_1}=35.38 \%\]
Using year-2 as the base year: \[g_{b_2}=31.23 \%\]
After choosing one base year, calculate the Price Index by applying the equation: \[Real \hspace{0.2cm} GDP = \frac{Nominal \hspace{0.2cm} GDP}{Price \hspace{0.2cm}level}\]
If year-1 is the base year, then the Price Index (PI) for year 1 is: \[ P I_1=NominalGDP_1 / RealGDP_1=130 / 130=1 \]
And the PI for year 2, will be given by: \[ PI_2= NominalGDP_2 / RealGDP_2=292 / 176=1.659 \]
As the inflation rate \((\pi)\) is the percentage change in the Price Index, we get: \[ \pi=(1.659-1) / 1=65.9 \% \]
Obviously, we can do the same for the case where year-2 is the base year. Will \(\pi\) be the same? No! Why?
In the National Accounts there are many indicators to provide a measure of inflation. Three of the most relevant ones are:
Consumption G&S saw their prices increasing more than those of the other components of GDP since the 1940’s.
The Housing Price Index started to be developed only in the 1980s, but it is currently one of the most important macroeconomic variables. The financial crisis that started in 2007 was triggered by the burst of a housing bubble.
The total adult civilian population [16 to 66 years] is divided into 2 major groups:
Nominal interest rates are only relevant for arbitrage/speculation.
For decision making about real economic activity (long term real investment, buying a house, etc.), relevant is the real interest rate.
The Fisher equation. This equation highlights a simple but very important relationship: \[r = i − \pi\] \(i\): nominal interest rate, \(r:\) real interest rate, \(\pi:\) inflation rate
Under normal conditions, nominal interest rates can not go below \(0\%.\)
What about real interest rates?
Below we plot the most common measure of a short-term real interest rate (3-Month Treasury Bills rate minus the CPI inflation rate in the USA) How often was it negative?